Skip to main content
ServiceXRG
  • Your Challenges
    • Overview
    • Strategic Support Assessment
  • Our Solution
    • Overview
    • Achieve Strategic Support
    • Our Process
    • Strategic Support Framework
    • Membership
  • Why ServiceXRG
    • Overview
    • Capabilities
    • Clients
    • Team
  • Resources
    • Resource Library
    • Blog
    • Support Leadership, Unfiltered
  • Member Login
ServiceXRG
  • Member Login
  • Strategic Support Assessment
  • Let’s Talk
  • Your Challenges
    • Overview
    • Strategic Support Assessment
  • Our Solution
    • Overview
    • Achieve Strategic Support
    • Our Process
    • Strategic Support Framework
    • Membership
  • Why ServiceXRG
    • Overview
    • Capabilities
    • Clients
    • Team
  • Resources
    • Resource Library
    • Blog
    • Support Leadership, Unfiltered

Blog : Closing Knowledge Base Gaps

  • Previous Post
  • All Posts
  • Next Post

Closing Knowledge Base Gaps

By Tom Sweeny November 8, 2023

Lack of content to address a customer issue is the most common reason for underperformance of self-services.

The Deflection Gap

Customers use self-services, yet too often, resolution of issues remains elusive. ServiceXRG defines this underperformance of self-service resources as the Deflection Gap.

The Deflection Gap is the difference between the Usage Rate of self-service resources and the Resolution Rate of issues solved without direct support from assisted resources.

There are three primary reasons for the Deflection Gap:

  1. Lack of Content.
  2. Customer Comprehension of Content found.
  3. Lack of Confidence in the content offered.

This article examines steps necessary to close the Deflection Gap by addressing the Lack of Content.

Reasons for Content Gaps

Lack of content is the most common reason self-service resources do not fully resolve customer issues. Lack of content does not always mean the content does not exist. In some cases, gaps exist because content cannot be found or recognized as the answer.

Content Does not Exist

The content necessary to answer a customer question does not exist within the knowledge base or other self-help repositories such as self-paced training, communities, video, etc.

There is a gap between what customers want to know and what content has been created to respond to that specific customer need.

Identifying gaps in knowledge coverage can reduce this deficiency.

Content Cannot be Found

The content may exist but cannot be easily found by a customer.

This occurs when search and discovery tools lack the necessary precision to recall resources that are related to a customer’s need, or answers are in disparate knowledge repositories.

Powerful search with intuitive natural language query support and federated knowledge repositories can reduce this deficiency.

Content Not Recognized as the Answer

The content exists but is not recognized by the customer as the solution to their answer.

Customers may look for a specific answer to their question but may skip over relevant information if it is embedded in long, complex articles or buried deep within user guides or training resources.

Surfacing answers to specific questions in concise articles or videos can reduce this deficiency.

Identifying Content Gaps

Content gaps are identifiable when there is a clear customer need and no supporting self-service content available to respond. The following methods can be used to identify content gaps:

Topic Classification

Organize knowledge needs expressed by customers within common categories.

Develop a taxonomy to organize content by product feature, customer use case, or any other category to express a customer need or outcome.

Evaluate the extent of knowledge coverage for key categories customers ask about.

Query logs

Review the terms customers use to search for content. Determine if matching documents are found.

Consider if the reason for a content gap is due to missing content or inability to find information.

Take corrective action to develop content and/or improve search effectiveness.

Case Topic Analysis

Analyze the reasons for support cases to determine which if any could be resolved by self-help content.

Identify if content exists to provide a satisfactory answer to customers.

Community Discussions

Scan community forms to identify the topics that matter most to customers.

Community discussions hold a wealth of insight into what customers are interested in and where they may have issues using your product.

Prioritize

Prioritize topic gaps based on volume of issues that may be resolved and/or the potential savings from increasing self-service effectiveness.

 

Close Content Gaps

Here are key steps to identify and close content gaps:

  1. Analyze submitted customers cases, search logs, and community discussions to identify the top issues customers need help with.
  2. Conduct analysis of knowledge assets to determine the extent of corresponding coverage of top customer needs.
  3. Evaluate the reasons content gaps exist (missing content, not found, not recognized as the answer).
  4. Prioritize topic gaps based on volume of issues that may be resolved and/or the potential savings from increasing self-service effectiveness.

 

For more insights and guidance on optimizing your customer support strategies contact ServiceXRG.

The Essential Guide to Self-Service Success

More content doesn’t equal better self-service.

Learn how to build self-service that actually resolves issues, lowers support demand, and improves customer outcomes through disciplined measurement and continuous optimization.

This guide shows how to quantify and improve self-service effectiveness—so it delivers real resolution, efficiency, and business impact.

Get a Copy
  • Previous Post
  • All Posts
  • Next Post

Subscribe for even more resources and the latest in your inbox.

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Name*

By clicking the "Submit" button you accept and agree to be bound by the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

Related Posts

  • 2.13.26 Read Time: 3 Mins

    AI’s Promise, Leadership’s Test

    As AI adoption accelerates, some organizations will choose to use AI to elevate support’s strategic relevance, while others will automate activity without improving outcomes. Here’s what makes the difference.

  • Read Time: 3 Mins

    Choosing the Battles That Build Leadership Credibility

    Strategic support leaders choose moments where support’s perspective can materially improve outcomes the business already cares about. Here’s how to know which battles to fight.

  • Read Time: 4 Mins

    From Reactive Support to Strategic Relevance: A Leadership Journey

    Where is your support organization on the journey from reactive containment to strategic relevance? Here’s the roadmap—and how to recognize which stage you’re in.

ServiceXRG

© Service Excellence Research Group, LLC 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Website by Imagebox

Contact Info
  • Email: info@servicexrg.com
  • Phone: 800-475-0089
Social Media
  • LinkedIn
  • Newsletter
  • Twitter